Who must the Board of Pharmacy report to if a proposed rule may increase state costs for public employees?

The correct answer is based on the requirement for the Board of Pharmacy to ensure transparency and accountability regarding proposed rules that could potentially increase state costs for public employees. In Minnesota, when such a situation arises, the Board is mandated to report to the finance or budget divisions of the state legislature, particularly those committees that oversee health and human services. This enables lawmakers to assess the implications of the proposed rules on the state budget and make informed decisions.

This reporting mechanism serves as a check to ensure that fiscal implications are considered when creating or amending regulations affecting public services. By involving both the Senate and House representatives, the Board of Pharmacy facilitates a comprehensive legislative review process, allowing for broader oversight in terms of budgeting and resource allocation. This ensures that any increase in state costs is adequately justified and scrutinized by those who hold the fiscal responsibility.

The other options may involve important roles in governance, but they do not specifically pertain to the legislative oversight required in this context. The governor focuses on executive decisions, while the state auditor typically reviews financial operations and compliance. The attorney general's office mainly handles legal matters, rather than legislative financial oversight.