Who could be held responsible if the board finds any person in an advisory role sets policies to prevent counseling/providing DUR?

The correct answer reflects a comprehensive view of accountability within different business structures in the pharmacy profession. If the board determines that an individual in an advisory role is responsible for setting policies that hinder patient counseling or the provision of drug utilization reviews (DUR), it implies that those in positions of authority or significant influence must be held accountable.

In a sole proprietorship, the owner has full responsibility for all actions of the pharmacy. In a partnership, each partner can be held liable for decisions made by the others, as partnerships often have shared responsibilities among members. Similarly, in a corporate setting, officers and directors are accountable for establishing policies and procedures, including those affecting patient care and safety. This accountability is crucial in maintaining compliance with legal and ethical standards in pharmacy practice.

Consequently, the ability to hold each of these parties accountable ensures that all facets of pharmacy operations are responsible for upholding the standards of care, including the critical function of counseling and DUR. Thus, the answer encompasses all individuals in these roles to ensure a broad spectrum of responsibility is recognized in safeguarding patient interests.