Which of the following does NOT need to be documented when unlicensed personnel administer medications?

The requirement for detailed documentation when unlicensed personnel administer medications is essential for patient safety and accountability. The correct answer indicates that the signature of the pharmacist on duty does not need to be documented in this context.

When medications are administered by unlicensed personnel, it's crucial to document aspects such as the method of administration, the date and time the medication was given, and any reasons for not administering all medications as ordered. This documentation helps maintain a clear record of what was done, ensuring continuity of care and protecting against potential liabilities.

The signature of the pharmacist on duty is generally not required to be documented in this specific situation because the responsibility for direct oversight and verification of administration often falls to protocols within the institution rather than requiring a formal signature for each instance. Thus, this choice stands out as the correct answer, as the documentation responsibilities do not typically extend to a pharmacist's signature for medication administration by unlicensed personnel.