What is the consequence of a pharmacy practicing without a pharmacist on duty?

Practicing pharmacy without a pharmacist on duty is a serious violation of pharmacy laws and regulations, and it jeopardizes patient safety as well as the integrity of the pharmacy practice. In Minnesota, the law mandates that a licensed pharmacist must be present to oversee the practice of pharmacy, ensuring that medications are dispensed properly and that patients receive the necessary professional guidance.

When a pharmacy operates without a pharmacist, it not only poses risks of medication errors but also violates the legal requirements that govern pharmacy operations. The revocation of the pharmacy license is a consequence that reflects the gravity of this violation. The licensing authority views this absence as undermining the standards of care expected in the profession. Revocation indicates that the pharmacy cannot continue its operations legally until the issues are resolved, which may include ensuring a licensed pharmacist is present moving forward.

The other options, while serious, do not match the severity and implications of practicing without a pharmacist. Fines or temporary suspensions serve as penalties for various infractions but typically do not encompass the complete lack of a pharmacist on duty, which fundamentally disrupts the operational legitimacy of the pharmacy itself. Therefore, the most appropriate consequence in this scenario is the potential revocation of the pharmacy license.