What happens if a board member's term ends and no successor is appointed?

When a board member's term ends and no successor is appointed, the correct concept is that the member can continue to serve until they are replaced. This practice helps ensure continuity in the board's operations and decision-making processes. It prevents the disruption that could occur if a vacancy were to exist in a critical leadership position, allowing the board to remain functional.

In the context of board governance, it's common for members to serve beyond their formal term until a new appointee is confirmed. This practice ensures that there is no lapse in authority or oversight within the board, which is essential for maintaining the board’s efficacy, particularly in regulatory contexts like pharmacy.

In contrast, leaving the position vacant would create potential delays in board actions and decisions, while immediate appointments or restrictions on extending terms do not align with standard procedures for ensuring board stability. Therefore, it is appropriate to allow a current member to continue serving their role until the necessary appointment is made.